Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

eric siu šŸˆ pfp
eric siu šŸˆ
@randomishwalk
TLSNotary seems cool: https://tlsnotary.org/
2 replies
0 recast
10 reactions

Prasad  pfp
Prasad
@prasadclr
Check out MPC TLS by Pado labs, 7-15x faster- using garbled circuits and IZK https://ugc.production.linktr.ee/Pw4l2aAReSIzLbE8tEbP_964.pdf
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc pfp
EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Still havenā€™t solved the collusion problem. What theyā€™ll tell you is you need to generate the same proof from multiple MPC nodes to be sure.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Prasad  pfp
Prasad
@prasadclr
How does one solve collusion?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc pfp
EmpiricalLagrange - tevm/acc
@eulerlagrange.eth
Just started a company in this space, and there are a few competitors. Iā€™m the only one with a good answer to this question is my claim. I donā€™t want to make it public until Iā€™m far enough along. Hope you understand. Itā€™s a simple solution IMO, and doesnā€™t rely on SGX.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

eric siu šŸˆ pfp
eric siu šŸˆ
@randomishwalk
ok i thought you were gonna say SGX or aws nitro or whatever the proprietary azure / gcp equivalent of that is (i think some AMD chip??)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

eric siu šŸˆ pfp
eric siu šŸˆ
@randomishwalk
fixated now on this coordination and ā€œgate keepingā€ question you raised which is to say, idk how hard it would be to get these diff actors to cooperate and agree if you wanted to go down the semi-permissioned route and in collusion scenario, could you have some way of detecting and enforcing independent action?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction