Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Future of Radio pfp
Future of Radio
@michael-smith
Our project response to Dan's authentic thoughts on channels. Please share with friends and networks.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nabil Abdellaoui pfp
Nabil Abdellaoui
@randombishop
Interesting take. I actually liked @dwr.eth responses, sounded very lucid imo and underlined the true challenge, which is how to attract best quality content. Imo, one thing that could be better is the warpcast algorithm. It seems to favor hyperactive accounts right now, with 10% of users making 90% of the cast, recast, like, reply, follow activities. A simple improvement could be giving more weight to the activity that comes from the accounts who participate less: in other words a like from someone who likes 10 casts per month should be worth more than a like that comes from a bot who likes 100k casts per month, the latter should probably be completely ignored by the algos. About the channels design and how to align incentives, that's a very hard question, I don't really have an opinion.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Future of Radio pfp
Future of Radio
@michael-smith
I agree. I thought his video was very authentic and why I responded to it. I have noticed @farcaster community responds quickly to natural criticisms about anything to do with the protocol, which is important to any iconic ecosystem. An essential part of the future of radio projects is critical review. Thank you, your take is deeply respected.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction