Music

Scale 1-7. Rating. 6 

"The solutions to big concerns are right in front of you." - unknown.

DWR quote "How do we get quality content to channels? Honestly, we do not know."

"Future of Radio" Response. Essentially, Any quality channel @farcaster, or other place; notably new radio, tv, art house, etc., have 4 primary groups; founders, creators, casters, & audience. What is happening now is most creative content originate as links to others work, often stored by centralized entities.

Ex. Music channel links to Spotify or YouTube. So perception of quality is scattered, preventing momentum & scaling.

So, any new channel might consider allowing only caster owned creative content. Example. Independent Music Channel. Conceptual founders, creators, and casters share two important  traits. They own their own publishing company and self moderate programming by near consensus, minting, etc. Go back in time and ask Prince. He would agree. Probably near consensus with the most influential musical artists of our time.

Our project response to Dan's authentic thoughts on channels. Please share with friends and networks.

artist owned projects & distribution music art fashion cinema socials builders integrators concert tickets mints mutual aid valid settlement audits 🔊 

Printing "Hello World" since 1980. Building app.datascience.art

I agree. I thought his video was very authentic and why I responded to it. I have noticed @farcaster  community responds quickly to natural criticisms about anything to do with the protocol, which is important to any iconic ecosystem. An essential part of the future of radio projects is critical review. Thank you, your take is deeply respected.

Interesting take. I actually liked @dwr.eth responses, sounded very lucid imo and underlined the true challenge, which is how to attract best quality content.
Imo, one thing that could be better is the warpcast algorithm. It seems to favor hyperactive accounts right now, with 10% of users making 90% of the cast, recast, like, reply, follow activities.
A simple improvement could be giving more weight to the activity that comes from the accounts who participate less: in other words a like from someone who likes 10 casts per month should be worth more than a like that comes from a bot who likes 100k casts per month, the latter should probably be completely ignored by the algos.
About the channels design and how to align incentives, that's a very hard question, I don't really have an opinion.