over the past couple of days there's been a new element on farcaster that we haven't seen much before: a project attacking another project and its founders to try to bolster its own position

i want to be really clear: 

1. I will defend Moxie and our team and our track record as serious builders forever and forever with vigor

2. No one needs to tear anyone else down to build yourself up. It may produce near term gains but it wont win in the long term

3. As we've said from day 0, our ambition with Moxie is to be the financial layer of Farcaster in a positive-sum way that enables everyone to win together. We will not rest and we will not waver on that mission.

Crypto enthusiast, ethics, movies and photography.

Founder of /gentlemanswagers

Just the fact that when @degen-chad apologized for coming down at Maxi, you doubled down. Without any reason whatsoever. And continued the toxicity (which is exactly what @betashop.eth is talking about going against). 

And now you clap clap clap to what he says. 

That's why I said "that's rich". I think my response is justified.

Im not the CEO of MOXIE.  But what exactly would you point to that would justify this response on here ?

Web3 marketer. Head of lots of stillborn, but cool projects. Blockchain for direct democracies. Hat stays on. Host of /shift

Nothing in particular as far as I'm concerned. My point was not about either project, but sth/someone else. Moot point now.

Words were said, on both sides. I still think there is no need for that. But it is what it is.

What’s the project attacking actually? Somehow I missed the drama.