A couple of years ago, I identified two main usecases for blockchains: objective money/finance and objective identity

However, over time, I've warmed to the idea that objective identity does not actually require strict global consensus. A less strict, loosely ordered global consensus may be adequate

Really, it's only money that requires strict consensus, or anything else of *temporal* economic value

While identity does have economic value, it is in most cases non-temporal in nature, and can hence be achieved better with loosely ordered alternatives to blockchains

I think we are going to see a huge change to ephemeral state versus persistent state. only persistent state requires consensus, the rest requires just conflict-resolution.

My hunch there is that we look from system that are consequential to systems that are relational.