Nat Emodi pfp
Nat Emodi
@emodi
A year ago, a vampire attack (w a token) from LooksRare seemed set to unseat OpenSea Why is Blur different?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Maybe @jacob knows?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

jacob pfp
jacob
@jacob
1. Net new market model on the bid side which lead to dominant floor liquidity. Which is where most trades happen 2. Didn’t honor royalties or charge fees, which saved traders 5%-10% 3. Trader focused UX, real-time market focused Market is top heavy with ~3K users driving most of the volume, the above won them.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Nat Emodi pfp
Nat Emodi
@emodi
Makes sense, just doesn’t seem sustainable for anyone except traders, or market expanding ie this is a weird/narrow definition of “winning”
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
I think the common misconception is that most* marketplaces are building for retail consumers. They are not. They are building for transaction volume (traders). Blur understood this better than anyone and has won over the Ideal Customer Profile that generated the most revenue
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nat Emodi pfp
Nat Emodi
@emodi
How does Blur generate revenue without charging any fees? Does this ICP remain loyal or will they just move to the next zero fee platform?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction