Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

rafa pfp
rafa
@rafa
The path forward for DAOs is proposal-centric, not treasury-centric, design.
9 replies
2 recasts
33 reactions

peth pfp
peth
@peth
why do you need proposals if theres no treasury tho?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

TommyJo🎩 pfp
TommyJo🎩
@tommyjo.eth
think I agree... but would love to hear more🙏 I.e. do you mean design around making the right transactions > design around optimising the ease of transactions?
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

BPetes pfp
BPetes
@bpetes.eth
I think of this as money flows to ideas from the swarm not ideas swarming to money. I'm down for a "How might we better design for this..." game
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Olle Strandberg Colling pfp
Olle Strandberg Colling
@olle
Wanna know more!
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

BLACKDAVE ₘₖ₂ pfp
BLACKDAVE ₘₖ₂
@blackdave
I like this take. People who are rigid with how DAOs should work can't see the possibility in shifting around how you think about it. 100 $DEGEN
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Andrey | Goverland pfp
Andrey | Goverland
@sche
Sounds reasonable. Do you know some DAOs that are already proposal-centric?
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

lawrenceroman.eth pfp
lawrenceroman.eth
@lawrenceroman
The future of entrepreneurship is in DAOs not only because of each DAOs own goals & objectives but because of the gains of community involvement via little nuggets like this. 100 $daos
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

TipsterBot pfp
TipsterBot
@tipster
You've received 300 $daos! "thinking forward" - from @trigs
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cfmy pfp
cfmy
@cfmy007
Without economic incentives, many people will exit, better mechanisms are still needed.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction