🌈 YON
@yonfrula
this is my first time ever casting no-channel. only the real ones can see this.
64 replies
17 recasts
207 reactions
Archilles ༄
@archilles
My man The restrictions have been crazy tbh
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
🌈 YON
@yonfrula
i hate not being able to see my friend's replies to my casts, only because they're not members of the channel i casted in...didn't know it worked like that.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Josh Ellithorpe
@quest
I think if users are friends then replies should be allowed in a channel. This would allow that user to be seen by channel mods and possibly be extended an invite. Overall engagement would go up, without a risk of spam. @v @dwr.eth
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1. You follow me because I give important updates but think my political takes are bad 2. You have a cozy political channel with your friends 3. I reply trolling you
2 replies
0 recast
3 reactions
Josh Ellithorpe
@quest
I would also argue this is way less common than you having a friend that is legit and would post amazing content that the community is now missing out on.
2 replies
0 recast
2 reactions
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Owners wanted control over who can reply. Consistent feedback for the last year.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Josh Ellithorpe
@quest
Those channels obviously wouldn't opt into this behavior. They can still do exactly what they wanted. For larger channels that want to limit spam but allow more content, then they could allow friends of members to reply.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Might be a nice iteration. Also you already get the notification from people you follow who reply but are not a member
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction