Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
DegenPad🎩🐹
@degenpad
🎩 Important news They (Razdva) have finally given up on cashing out and have moved on to supporting ecosystem projects through us /degenpad. Thank you for your involvement in De[degen] activities. @wake.eth cc @pichi
10 replies
0 recast
27 reactions
Q🎩
@qsteak.eth
What were some of the considerations given before allowing this? I kind of feel they should not be accepted. It would seem the “farming burden” is now shifted to the projects supported via ITO. Know they know they will have extractive holders of their token of they launch. Is your fee tainted? Don’t personally like the decision but could be convened immediately not considering all factors.
3 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
mvr 🐹
@mvr
Yeah I also do not think this is the way. Maybe @degentip @degentip can maximize their ITO allocation. I'm OKE with you taking the tips but am afraid for my investment in the ITO (o wow am I making this about me again)
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Houyhnhnm
@houyhnhnm
your insight inspires me 10 $DEGEN
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Houyhnhnm
@houyhnhnm
good point. i see it differently though. farming circles and using perl make cashing out tips as degen easy. ITO projects get tips as their tokens. farmers decide to cash out or hold for future value. launching ITO means agreeing to token sale burdens. They get degen to expand their activities, depending on builder execution. it’s up to the builders to handle and lead, regardless of farming. by bearing the burden of token extraction, builders get a tremendous opportunity to fund and grow their projects.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
