One of the charts that pisses me off.

GTFO when you’re 70, go enjoy your family or other hobby and let someone younger take over.

Building https://srcbook.com // creator of the https://blockchainsmokers.xyz

Also this is a chart designed to outrage… considering the upper limit is 25% so the <70y/o cohort making up the remaining 75-99% would tower over this figure. I agree old people need to sit down, but this may also be indicative of politicians aging out and the trend of life expectancy in general 🤷

I think term limits would be a much better way to solve this than having an age cap. Nobody would vote an 85 year old into office, but they would vote for one who's been in the senate for 6 terms to prevent the opposing party from gaining power.

From a friend who has worked on the hill for 10+ years: 

“Big reason for this is lobbyists. Longer you’re in power, more former staffers you have. You move up the ranks they all cash in off of your status”

The pulse of the Farcaster community | Follow for new surveys 📋 | By @ba and @cojo.eth | Visit weponder.io for results. 

@survey should congress have an age limit?

So like the companies that lobby old folks in US congress… I should invest in?