Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

limes pfp
limes
@limes.eth
I’m on a quest to get more people to use a .eth as their Farcaster username. If you don’t use your .eth as your username, why not and what would make you change your mind?
31 replies
3 recasts
24 reactions

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
@pugson is simpler than @pugson.eth i also have pug.eth but it’s the same amount of characters as @pugson but more complex
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

🎣 pfp
🎣
@broke
Emoji + pugson.eth (or pug.eth) is shorter than 'pugson @pugson' fwiw
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
your eyes see the bold text first
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

🎣 pfp
🎣
@broke
maybe but 'pugson @pugson' is not less complex or shorter
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
i’m only talking about the username and not the display name
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

🎣 pfp
🎣
@broke
ok not trying to deflect or anythign but how is the username relevant without display name
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
that’s how you tag people in casts. the username is more relevant than the display name
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

🎣 pfp
🎣
@broke
Why not embolden that then In reality the display name is the most important, as like you say it's the first thing people see
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

pugson pfp
pugson
@pugson
idk that’s how most apps do it. display name is important in the context of a feed. username is important in the context of a single cast body.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

🎣 pfp
🎣
@broke
many apps have m combined too like reddit ig tiktok youtube discord but yeah theres def advantages to it too, otherwise couldnt add .eth on twitter. just dont think that shortness is the reason that .eth isnt used as widely on farcaster(/generally in crypto)
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction