proxy
@proxystudio.eth
so many people have asked me why we aren't using a bonding curve + graduation to dex model. we could! but there are many launchpads on base that use such a model, wow is one example, wanting clanker to use this is interesting - why not just use those vs wanting clanker curves? because clanker is clanking this stuff matters so much less than we think. same goes for the unit bias, supply conversation. up good down bad
4 replies
3 recasts
19 reactions
nyc-crypto-cabal-kid
@zinger
Agreed, although I do think that 100m would be better than 1b since it allows people to rally around round numbers: $0.01, $0.10, $1
1 reply
0 recast
6 reactions
CryptoPanda🎩
@oxcryptopanda
I also don't like bonding curve. uniswap is wonderful.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Terry Bain
@terrybain
keep clanking... one of the reasons I prefer claniker is because it doesn't use the bonding curve. Post cast. Have token. If people buy in they buy in. If they don't, they don't.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sangohan.base.eth 🟠
@sangohan
Ah, important information 🙏! Personally, I studied the case, and it’s for compatibility with the Mint Club SDK v2 that I thought it would have been cool. Child tokens of the Clanker token would have been awesome 😄. They already have so many ready-to-use features Airdrop, lockup, and more… But there are always solutions to use both. Uni tokens are perfect for reaching the widest audience right from launch, which is a significant advantage 🚀.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
