Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/midwits
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
basil
@itsbasil
i’ve been at war with myself all day on whether or not i should move my higher & anon into lower cap clanker tokens the early whales in both holder bases continue to rotate, which is why these tokens fizzle on any non-news days—this is particularly the case with anon i believe in both projects & want to hold but i also believe the meta will evolve over the next few months in a way that may work against them i have similar reservations with veil, which is obviously awesome tech, but don’t know that many people scouring base are going to be interested in gambling on that over a small cap clanker life is one big opportunity cost
10 replies
3 recasts
47 reactions
alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
would not sell $anon personally, recently began accumulating slowly given the direction of anon.world and some stuff
2 replies
0 recast
6 reactions
alex 🎩
@proxystudio.eth
but to clarify, yes you should definitely get some exposure to lower cap clankers theyve been performing great recently and some aren't lower caps anymore. attention is cruel, it won't track project quality. but clankers have a nice dynamic where most of the top mc coins frequently have very sick founders/dev stuff happening
0 reply
1 recast
2 reactions
dusan.framedl.eth 🎩
@ds8
is there a connection (other than spiritual) between anon.world and $anon? i follow the project, but it seems to me it's actually slowly drifting away from the token itself — adding more credentials other than "holding $anon" dilutes the attention. wdyt?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
