Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
v0 self-claims are live courtesy of @dish and @yungwknd for working hard to get this done. We're making steady progress getting one of our most powerful features (rewards) live, in the front end for all of our creators coming soon: design! points - for traders, creators, and partners that build with us
8 replies
26 recasts
116 reactions
rgibbard
@robgibbard
Bro pls can you get back to me on the situation for $RKT, it feels like we’ve been trying to get a clear answer on this for a hot minute, and the docs don’t seem to explain our specific situation… we would love to put this to bed. If it was solely clanker deployed do we not receive fees? Or are you saying it wasn’t solely clanker deployed? If so where have these fees gone?? Our team have been draining our personal wallets to fund this project and it feels like we’re not really getting anywhere man.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
no fees have been claimed on $RKT, what are you trying to get a clear answer on? according to our db @clanker is the deployer wallet so the rewards will be credited to his FID custody address (I believe)
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
rgibbard
@robgibbard
I understand that clanker was the deployer BUT who was the requestor… we’ve been trying to get these manual fees distributed to our community wallet to fund the project but if clanker was the requestor how do we get the fees?? If clanker wasn’t the requestor as we assumed, who is?? and why would they get the fees when they have contributed nothing. This token feels unique and the community needs an understanding of what is to happen with the requestor 40% share of the fees.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
clanker was the requestor as of now the fees have not been claimed, as far as I remember this was a token created during a testing period pre launch? original cast was deleted. @dish and I will discuss, we are open to directing requestor rewards to a CTO community, but would need to set this up in a particular way to be comfortable doing so appreciate all the work you're doing getting deep into clanker lore, sorry for any delay in communication, you should see my inboxes. Trying to balance improving our product, helping users and working with people building on Clanker, and while he is a bot we are just two guys
5 replies
4 recasts
8 reactions
assayer
@assayer
to have 100% clarity by " clanker was the requestor" do you mean that the deleted request "I want a token that goes up a lot, but i don't know what to call it, can you suggest a name" did come from Clanker? (see below) https://warpcast.com/chainleft/0x8cc1339d
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
alex
@proxystudio.eth
clanker was both the requestor account and the deployer account I honestly can't help you beyond that, It's been a month and so much has happened. so little sleep. that copy sounds somewhat unlike clanker's typical vernacular but I do not remember typing it either. we were testing our experiment, this was either just before or after launch, right? I don't think this answer will make either of you happy but its what I got. I won't get any points from bot lore trenches for being honest but ya thats where we are!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
assayer
@assayer
i understand you can share only so much as you remember i guess we will live with that, and we will make up our minds thank you!
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
