Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
proxy
@proxystudio.eth
Don’t think hitting the 100x is very hard, it’s holding the 100x that’s the hard part One mental model I’ve used for some elements of speculative markets is information warfare. I think it’s an extremely dangerous assumption to believe that access to data, information or compute will tend towards equality
5 replies
8 recasts
58 reactions
kugusha 🦋
@kugusha.eth
Can I cast in the channel please. Have mid take on this
1 reply
0 recast
12 reactions
guozu🎩⛓️🔵 ⚪️🐹
@way
It is easy to conquer a territory but hard to maintain control over it
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
six
@six
Why is it dangerous to assume that? That seems to be what has happened historically wrt public markets I think hitting 100xs does get harder as markets mature. There’s just less asymmetry available the more consensus an asset class is
1 reply
1 recast
4 reactions
𒂠_𒍣𒅀_𒊑
@m-j-r
I'll take the other side of that. even if it isn't captured directly, there's going to be a lot of inference going into info deserts. and we haven't seen what agentic consortiums solve with such dynamics.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
cav4lier.base.eth
@cav4lier
my stupid strategy is working
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction