Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Chainleft
@chainleft
In my experience*, ~20 years ago campaigning negatively AGAINST the opponents instead of positively FOR your agenda was perceived as cringe. Today, it's cringe to be a passionate Trump supporter or a passionate Harris supporter. Being a passionate anti-Harris or anti-Trump person is a lot more acceptable. At the end of the day, who wants to be strongly associated with two unqualified warhawks (even if one is slightly better than the other)? The "lesser of two evils" logic isn't just bad for policies. It's also bad for discourse and even how you position yourself in society. *: Most parts of it outside the US
8 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Prosocialise Foundation🍄 🎩
@prosocialise
Have you noticed they don't talk about what they will do in office? It looks like their advisers forbid them to do so because doing so is bad for their campaign. Could it be because it's worse to have people against one of your plans than having people in favor of a part?
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
