Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gwei
@powpow
Hot take: The UI/UX of Ethereum needs serious work if we're to onboard the masses. Solana's rapid growth post-SBF convicition should be a wake up call.
5 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
MetaDave
@weitzetung
The only difference between arbitrum or zksync and Solana is fees, that’s it. Nobody forces you to bridge and most L2s have fiat or CEX on-ramps. Rabby wallet is way better than phantom wallet
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Gwei
@powpow
Swapping on Jupiter in Phantom is way better than Eth-based in-wallet swapping. Unless you can withdraw from a CEX on zksync or Arb, you're forced to bridge. Fiat on-ramps outside of CEXs literally gauge their customers.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MetaDave
@weitzetung
So what? You do all in a wallet? Swapping on LLamaswap, Matcha or Paraswap is basically the same, I don’t get the Jupiter hype, but I use it on Solana as well. L2 to L2 bridges cost nothing to Pennie’s, don’t really see that as problematic. Best part, just stay on one L2 as you stay on one L1, problem solved.
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction
Gwei
@powpow
It’s not the same though
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
MetaDave
@weitzetung
Not in my view, only difference is fee. I actually like transacting on zksync and arbitrum more than on Solana. I also like rabby wallet more than phantom.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction