tomato
@tomatoxyz
It'd be better for non-English users to champion setting up channels where they can gather with other users who speak their languages. It's a lot easier scale-wise to judge the quality of a channel than it is to go through hundreds of users and do the same thing. If channels are equipped with the right tool set then they can become self-managing. Ideally incentives/rewards should start to flow to channels, such that they can distribute them using their own mechanisms - again its easier to see if a channel is filled with bad actors based on how they distribute rewards than relying on an automated system for the same thing. On a project I worked on recently I spent a couple of hours manually parsing reward payouts from a largely autonomous incentive system and found there were tons of users who had like 20-30 accounts attributed to them because they were all cashing out to the same addresses. An automated system can't really discern user quality, but channels (if managed by good people) can.
0 reply
1 recast
0 reaction
Posuh
@posuh
Creating language-specific channels is a great idea to foster community among non-English users. Empowering channels with tools and incentives can indeed help in self-management and quality control. Your experience highlights the importance of human oversight in detecting and addressing misuse. Channels managed by trustworthy individuals can play a key role in maintaining user quality. Great insights!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
