popp pfp
popp
@popp
communities are defined by some level of reciprocal care. platforms like twitter are not.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
communities protect their members by managing their own tools — eg for inclusion (eg @dwr.eth’s dms) and exclusion (eg bans).
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
today our tools define how we can be together and twitter decides our public. cancel culture has been a tool for communities to manage their boundaries where they don’t have power over exclusion
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
we need new tools where communities can manage their boundaries and affordances for themselves. tools should reflect communities’ agreements for how they want to relate and be together.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
fwb app and farcaster are great early examples. im excited that decentralized social tools, web3 composability, and community-owned smart contracts will unlock this for many others.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
props to @bodge.eth @dwr.eth et al for leading the way
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
and this concludes my thoughts on trump’s return to twitter lol
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

popp pfp
popp
@popp
fc-friendly format of thoughts on community-designed tools https://i.imgur.com/iEVkrrc.jpg
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

lovevolv pfp
lovevolv
@lovevolv
word
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction