walletbeat

If you're launching a wallet, should it be an EOA or Smart Wallet (4337)? 

EOAs become upgradeable with 7702 later this year, so you get the benefits of 4337 wallets and can upgrade to better standards over time. 

So it comes down to: upgradeable smart wallets (EOA + 7702 + 4337*) or pure smart wallets (4337 only) ?

Technowatermelon. Elder Millenial. Building Farcaster. 

nf.td/varun

This is something I'm struggling with as well, to create a /walletbeat criteria around this.

Clearly either solution is better than an EOA-only wallet, and most Ethereum wallets today are still EOA-only. So the next logical step is to treat both standard as a step forward over the status quo. But not clear what the next step beyond that should be.

What is also unambiguous is that 4337 wallets need further standardization between themselves, so that 4337-only wallets can interoperate for key rotation etc. Perhaps standards will naturally develop as wallets settle into the no-longer-EOA-only world.

cc @samwilsn

Interesting thread, relevant for the /walletbeat criteria around account type support (EOA, 4337, 7702).

Interesting thread, relevant for the /walletbeat criteria around account type support (EOA, 4337, 7702).
https://warpcast.com/polymutex.eth/0x751bb405

A doodler and computerer. I like permissive/permissionless open source, smart contracts, p2p systems, room-scale VR, and NixOS.

shazow.net

Currently: WhatsABI

Contributor @ /walletbeat.

Censorship resistance requires privacy.