Founders

Something I noticed visiting a few companies w/ more than 250+ ppl:

- Meetings with a lot of people (more than 10 but not an all hands)
- Why do they all need to be here?
- Why do many of them look so uncomfortable / don't want to be here?
- How does this end up happening?
- Wtf?

ref: "purpose aligned networks of small autonomous teams” — @yeoro.eth 

point counter point: what @july is expressing exasperation at.
"coordination scale" masquerading as "collaboration scale"
↓

creating and destroying; built flying cars & autonomous vehicles, now building /faust, more here: /july, web: july.rocks

db.team → /slc → SuperBenefitDAO, All in For Sport → "purpose aligned networks of small autonomous teams”

You just hit upon one of my pet peeves. That being, this trend to keep adding on without knowing why, and usually without any system to effectively manage it.
The more people you add to meetings, the more likely an organization is to embody the Ringleman effect
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ringelmann_effect

off & onchain operations
<--->
Sharing ideas over at /workflow <--->
Problem solving is my jam😎
🎩

ref:cc: @yeoro.eth ↑ "Ringelmann effect" from Adam.

Adjacent idea to what Brook's surfaced in "Mythical Man Month" but observed at an even grosser/concrete level: "pulling on a rope" as opposed to the "communication overhead" as group size scales up.

🐵 ← 🙈🙉🙊 → /phil → phil.cockfield.net, db.team →  ƒ(trust / time) →  ƒ(open-commons) → ƒ( /sys )  ← @cell primitive<T> 🧫.

cross-ref: 
https://warpcast.com/adam-/0x56540f10
https://warpcast.com/pjc/0xb288cbe7