Phil Cockfield
@pjc
( ✊🏻💯 ) " I do not accept "it's too complex to understand" as a reasonable state to be in, because 1. I don't believe that anything is too complex to understand, as 2. it only means I have yet to find the right way to convey the information succinctly enough." - @cassie WTF is Q ← FAQ ( ✊🏻💯 )
3 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
• Scale • Structure • Privacy
3 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
↑ Scale: The scaling design mirrors the "shared-nothing" approach used by ScyllaDB, which enables extremely high horizontal scalability, and the execution context enables extremely fast trustless compute on private data.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
↑ Structure: ("timechain") "Q is a tabula rasa reinvention of a decentralized network, such that structurally it looks practically nothing like a blockchain – you could think of the global proof sequencing as the blockchain component, but it is more in line with Satoshi's original term used for BTC: timechain"
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
↑ Privacy: "Traffic is anonymized akin to Tor, analytic privacy and transactional settlement is further secured by the same technique proposed to stop MEV on Ethereum, and input privacy is provided through a multi-party confidential compute execution environment."
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
