Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
adrienne
@adrienne
Some thoughts: - important to get grounded on the definition of sufficient decentralization. I read Varun’s blog post before joining and was satisfied with their definition of decentralization - other protocols might be more decentralized, and we’re all welcome to use them if we think they’re a better path or will lead to a better outcome - Dan and Varun have been very consistent with their words and actions. You might not like their definition of decentralization or their approach for achieving it, but they’ve been very transparent and consistent - easy to get upset at merkle but if you believe in their vision they aren’t the enemy. We should be fighting the corporate owned platforms, not each other. Too many people trying to compete with merkle to build a viable warpcast competitor as the only way to be satisfied we’ve achieved decentralization - won’t vs. cant be evil. No need to compete with merkle if we’re building a future that doesn’t lock us in to warpcast
2 replies
1 recast
12 reactions
Phil Cockfield
@pjc
Beautifully, and more than sufficiently, stated Adrienne. Too many”good fights” to be had to waste time fighting inwardly our friends!
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
adrienne
@adrienne
🫡 🙏 And I hope my messages don’t get construed as not wanting to hear critiques or dissenting opinions. Communities and protocols alike are stronger when all ideas have a chance to be heard and discussed
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
