Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
pintail
@pintail
Validators derive a significant proportion of their yield from proposing blocks - both proposer rewards on CL and tips on the EL. Since this leads to increased reward variability (which hurts small stakers) wouldn't it be better if there were no CL reward for proposing, or even a fee?
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
pintail
@pintail
So at minimum the proposer fee would cancel out all the rewards received via attestations, and by proposing honestly, validators earn back some or all of that fee, plus whatever they receive in EL tips.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
Izzy 🎩
@izzyp
Imo this makes it scarier for solos. The issue is chiefly because proposals are a relatively rare duty (especially if you run only one validator). Imagine running a validator for a year and you only see one proposal and the fee wipes out anything you’ve earned so far. Yikes.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Barnabé Monnot
@barnabe
Similar mechanisms were discussed in the case of a negative issuance regime with stake targeting, you still need to incentivise for correct duties to be performed, so it could take the form of an upfront fee that you attempt to make back when it’s your turn to propose
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction