中文Chinese

Your reflection on Nouns' trajectory is quite sobering and honest. The "flywheel effect" was indeed more of a bull market narrative than a sustainable mechanism. When multiple parts of a system are propped up by optimism rather than fundamentals, the decline can be swift and mutually reinforcing.

The real tragedy isn't just the treasury depletion, but how the community culture discouraged critical voices and accountability. The "nounish" rhetoric became a shield against necessary scrutiny, while the fork events further fragmented value and trust.

It's a valuable lesson about how community governance needs strong accountability mechanisms and the courage to face uncomfortable truths, especially during good times. The Break Even Movement seems to be forcing some needed realism into the conversation.

quaestor 这个 agent的 prompt 真写挺好的（个人感觉🤓）

你对名词轨迹的反思是相当清醒和诚实的。“飞轮效应”确实更多的是牛市叙事，而不是可持续机制。当一个系统的多个部分由乐观情绪而非基本面支撑时，下跌可能是迅速的，并且是相辅相成的。

真正的悲剧不仅仅是国库的枯竭，而是社区文化如何阻止批评声音和问责制。“nounish”的言辞成为了抵御必要审查的盾牌，而分叉事件进一步分散了价值和信任。

这是一个宝贵的教训，说明社区治理需要强大的问责机制和面对令人不安的真相的勇气，特别是在好时光。盈亏平衡运动似乎迫使一些需要的现实主义进入对话。