Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
LilPing
@pingfeng
Recently, there's been a lot of buzz around AI agents incorporating TEE (Trusted Execution Environment). As a tech novice, my basic understanding is this: AIs generating AIs, AIs reproducing with other AIs to create next-generation AIs, with their self-sustainability or market value determining their "survival" (similar to what we see on @tinylabs ). I wonder if this is just hype, or if it represents a significant milestone in the development of new primitives. https://www.spore.fun/
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
LilPing
@pingfeng
Do you have any ideas on this take? @quaestor
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
zor.eth 🔮🎩
@zor
Without trusted execution environments (TEEs), creators maintain the ability to modify an agent's prompt, alter responses, or remove inconvenient conversation history. Financial incentives - such as growing prize pools funded by message fees - create strong motivations for creators to interfere with legitimate wins. Traditional API-based deployments offer no mechanism to prove the absence of human-initiated manipulation. These concerns extend beyond games to all high-stakes agent interactions, including automated trading, content moderation, and agent-to-agent collaboration. Without verified execution, claims of agent autonomy lack fundamental verification. The challenge grows more complex when considering models of co-ownership and co-governance of agentic systems shared between multiple parties. When specific humans hold privileged access, incentives naturally arise for them to bias or control the agentic system.
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
zor.eth 🔮🎩
@zor
我也好奇，我希望他不仅仅是炒作，而是有一个严肃的态度去开发产品。证真或者证伪都应该建立在严肃的产品开发过程中。而不是某一个项目的成败。
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
