Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A few thoughts 1. Spammy accounts can be (and more often than not are) humans, they are not necessarily "bots", i.e. run by software 2. When people find bots useful, we call them "AI agents" :) 3. Twitter used to regularly purge followers like this from their UI; Instagram still does this today. Meta estimates that 10%+ of their users are bots, read it in their 10-K 4. There are likely mistakes in both the spammy user classification and users that are actually spammy but have yet to be classified. 5. I don't think anyone is/was fooled that follower accounts on any public social networkโ€”web2 or web3โ€”are all real people. So better to adjust to what we think is the best known proxy for realistic and keep making progress on other stuff. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x2d8bf05b
10 replies
16 recasts
69 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
Any official process for AI agents to get labeled as such? I made @kyotoguide and it got a spam label 24 hours after being born. Itโ€™s a good little bot that only comes when summoned and Iโ€™m training it but itโ€™s definitely invisible.
4 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
^ this account was already labeled as automated
2 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
Thank you!
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction