Content
@
https://warpcast.com/~/channel/firstdraft
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Your Farcaster Casts are your CV (a 🧵) When I get a notification that someone commented on my post and I don’t recognize the name/pfp, the first thing I do is scroll their profile. I make a judgement in about 15 seconds and try to determine if I think you are an authentic account or a spammer/scammer/farmer. Here are the things I look for: 1. Are you posting original content? 2. Is your profile mostly recasts and frames? 3. If you are casting to big channels (cough /itookaphoto /nature) do the photos look like you took them or are they stolen from Pinterest? 4. Are you casting to channels that generate a lot of spam? (I’m not going to throw shade at the channels in public)
27 replies
12 recasts
98 reactions
Sheva
@sheva7.eth
Are you identifying channels with a high spam rate by aggregating the labels of cast contributors?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
I know many of them by gut feeling but now I have some dune dashboards to prove it ;) so yes!
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Sheva
@sheva7.eth
Thank you! Cast in those channels could risk being categorized as spam as well, so it’s important to be mindful of where we cast.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
I think channels are safe for now, but spammers seem to congregate in certain channels and if you follow them, you can look like you are part of an inauthentic network. @geoffgolberg has great information on this.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Sheva
@sheva7.eth
Yes, that’s right. Posting in a channel with a lot of spam could lead to continued interaction with spam users, so I was concerned about that. Focusing on Japanese channels: /moxiejapan has a spam posting rate (unique users) of 59%. https://dune.com/queries/4744878/7878331?channel_t6c1ea=moxiejapan /diet has a spam posting rate of 93%. https://dune.com/queries/4744878/7878331?channel_t6c1ea=diet /diet has very few bots, so the bias is quite significant. A negative social graph is likely to form.
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
