Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
A few thoughts 1. Spammy accounts can be (and more often than not are) humans, they are not necessarily "bots", i.e. run by software 2. When people find bots useful, we call them "AI agents" :) 3. Twitter used to regularly purge followers like this from their UI; Instagram still does this today. Meta estimates that 10%+ of their users are bots, read it in their 10-K 4. There are likely mistakes in both the spammy user classification and users that are actually spammy but have yet to be classified. 5. I don't think anyone is/was fooled that follower accounts on any public social network—web2 or web3—are all real people. So better to adjust to what we think is the best known proxy for realistic and keep making progress on other stuff. https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x2d8bf05b
10 replies
16 recasts
69 reactions
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Any official process for AI agents to get labeled as such? I made @kyotoguide and it got a spam label 24 hours after being born. It’s a good little bot that only comes when summoned and I’m training it but it’s definitely invisible.
4 replies
0 recast
11 reactions
base
@basewtf
Would love an appropriate label for my AI Agent, basewtfbot
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Pichi 🟪🍖🐹🎩 🍡🌸
@pichi
Same. I don’t think it should give engagement points or inflate metrics but I don’t want it to be invisible either.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
base
@basewtf
Yes exactly, their replies are invisible. Like if I ask @basewtfbot to create a Boston crème pie food mfer for you using mfer 3151 you won’t see the reply
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction