Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
This week on the State of the Union we chat invisible spam labels and strategies to avoid them! We will also talk upcoming FarScore cuts and how channel changes are treating everyone! Chat soon! Click โ€œrequest to joinโ€ to get the invite link to the call and the recording! https://events.xyz/events/3f906eeb
4 replies
5 recasts
21 reactions

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
@mvr would you consider a new frame to help explain and highlight this? I think it would be easy to show if you have a level 3 spam label (but more computing power) because we can still see the show more replies bucket on casts to the home feed. Now with channel changes and more people casting to home feeds, this may need ti be resurfaced. No idea how to show Level 0, 1, or 2, but maybe cross reference with Top Caster and Boost. If youโ€™ve received one, you were Level 1 at that time. I know Iโ€™ve seen a Dune tracking top casters, havenโ€™t seen one tracking boosts. Worth exploring?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

mvr ๐Ÿน pfp
mvr ๐Ÿน
@mvr
Hi, the frame currently only does level 3. It's skipping channels but takes longer to process (more timeouts) Especially when you're not a spammer frame will likely timeout (but continue in the background), next run should give quick results if soon enough after the initial run (it's cached for like 20 minutes)
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ pfp
Pichi ๐ŸŸช๐Ÿ–๐Ÿน๐ŸŽฉ ๐Ÿก๐ŸŒธ
@pichi
Maybe considering adding the label โ€œLevel 3 Spam Labelโ€? I want folks to start speaking in the correct lingo so we are all on the same page. There is so much nuisance here and confusion. Trying to think of ways to make this extremely clear to people.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

mvr ๐Ÿน pfp
mvr ๐Ÿน
@mvr
Marked as L3 Spammer? ๐Ÿ˜…
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction