Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

BetSwirl pfp
BetSwirl
@betswirl
We tried to boost a cast about Inter vs Barcelona using the amps mini-app, offering $50–100 to active Warpcast users who would help us spread the word: you can now place your Champions League bets directly on Warpcast, fully onchain — aiming to onboard Twitter/web2 users into web3 through something as universal as sports and football. The boost was flagged as a TOS violation by @ampsfun At BetSwirl, we’ve built a trustless, non-custodial betting protocol powered by Chainlink VRF — with no deposits, no gatekeeping and no middlemen. We don’t build in web1. We don’t build in web2 or web2.5. We build on web3. That’s a statement — and it has consequences. Web3 and censorship can’t go hand in hand. We’re building the future of web3 — with billions of users who can think, speak, and bet freely.
7 replies
34 recasts
35 reactions

phil pfp
phil
@phil
You're welcome to post anything you'd like from your own accounts. However, most users don't want to promote gambling content. This isn't censorship -- it's preventing our userbase from amplifying content they don't agree with. We're working on ways to request users to amplify content that doesn't pass our filter.
2 replies
0 recast
5 reactions

BetSwirl pfp
BetSwirl
@betswirl
Hey! Thanks for the response. About the “most users don't want to promote gambling content” part — we actually believed (and still do) that many users would love to support web3-native betting and help highlight its advantages over web2. Some would even do it for free — and many more if they’re rewarded for it. That said, maybe we’re wrong — but curious, how do you determine that users majority does not want to? What's that based on?
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

ZEEDAN🎩🐱👾 pfp
ZEEDAN🎩🐱👾
@zeedan
Ohh, i just know about that btw🥲
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction