phil
@phil
not bad for passive income! anyone else?
10 replies
4 recasts
36 reactions
Anemaleš©āšµć
@anemale.eth
The concept of amps is definitely interesting, no doubt about that. But arenāt the earnings mostly going to users with the most followers? I understand the logic behind it, but it seems that smaller or mid-sized accounts donāt earn nearly as much , mainly those with large followings benefit
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Miguelgarest
@miguelgarest.eth
as with most things in FC (i.e. rewards), people with large following/OGs are the ones making the big amounts š¤·āāļø
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
Anemaleš©āšµć
@anemale.eth
Yes, thatās a reality miguel and I wanted to add this for @phil This isnāt meant as negative criticism, quite the opposite. Itās all about finding ways to grow and evolve. For what itās worth, my favorite cartoon growing up was Robin Hood! Wouldnāt it be interesting if OGs with large followings had the option to share a portion of their earnings, maybe by sponsoring a smaller account of their choice or contributing to a crowdfunding ? Something along those lines could really strengthen the community spirit.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
phil
@phil
distribution is valuable i dont think making the product more communist is a good use of time, but we can do a better job helping to surface accounts with smaller but highly engaged followings
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Anemaleš©āšµć
@anemale.eth
The connection with Robin Hood is purely symbolic, I promise, I was just watching the cartoon with my kids and saw a few AMPs casts right afterward. That said, I donāt believe Robin Hood was promoting a communist economic or political system. He simply wanted fairer redistribution without suffering under oppression. So thereās no real link here with AMPs. But when I see small accounts expressing gratitude for earning $5 through AMPs, while others with larger followings highlight earnings close to $1,000, thatās where I feel compelled to speak up. The idea of supporting smaller accounts with strong engagement seems interesting to me
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction