social

Within two days of Brazil's X ban, Bluesky gained 500,000 users, with many also joining Mastodon and Threads. People often migrate to these (relatively) decentralized platforms to escape X, but this time, it wasn’t X pushing them away, they couldn’t use it.

Decentralized social media is always open to everyone.

Within two days of Brazil's X ban, Bluesky gained 500,000 users, with many also joining Mastodon and Threads. People often migrate to these (relatively) decentralized platforms to escape X, but this time, it wasn’t X pushing them away, they couldn’t use it.

Decentralized social media is always open to everyone.
https://www.theverge.com/2024/8/30/24232561/brazil-x-ban-sending-people-bluesky

crypto-anarchist · onchain social explorer, advisor · spread FC gospel in /chinese community · curate SocialSight.telegram· write 0xluo.xyz · host /luo ·中文 @luo

Why would this have been a bad thing for Farcaster to win here? More users, more press, more growth that sets a new baseline for DAUs even if some churn

Feels like a missed opportunity

𝓵𝓲𝓿𝓲𝓷𝓰 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝓮𝓷𝓭𝓵𝓮𝓼𝓼 𝓼𝓾𝓶𝓶𝓮𝓻 • building @buoy 🛟 • pfista.com

It was indeed a great opportunity, and it could have even been used for promotion. However, that didn’t happen. Farcaster is still not widely known in the mainstream. Moreover, for many people, every step from hearing about it, signing up, using it, staying on, to becoming active presents a challenge.

Chasing users fleeing another platform is not a long-term valuable strategy.

Effort is better spent trying to figure out the compelling reason for people to join the network independently.

If you have that, then you can use sudden external entropy to help grow.

But sign ups for the sake of sign ups don’t matter.

i mean dan puts up a mean argument about this and looking at it he may damn well be right

i mean dan puts up a mean argument about this and looking at it he may damn well be right 

https://warpcast.com/dwr.eth/0x7d6f5d72