Michael Pfister on Warpcast

keccers pfp

One way to look at this is that the luxury scale is moving downstream to the pre natal, the gestational. When everyone can run the card to get the $5k stroller, how else are you supposed to flex? Not sure why Ted’s asking us to think about the surrogate here. You aren’t supposed to. She’s an animal, a breed mare. A nameless, faceless, disposable person.

3 replies

2 recasts

27 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

why do you always quote cast me instead of replying to me lol

5 replies

2 recasts

19 reactions

keccers pfp

Because your company’s incentive structure rewards me to do it that way, mostly

3 replies

3 recasts

50 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp

ted (not lasso)

is that really why

5 replies

1 recast

11 reactions

keccers pfp

More or less yeah I can have a reply that won’t get seen nor count towards my “score” or I can have a quote that will and will. Ez

3 replies

1 recast

42 reactions

triumph pfp

less about the “score” but +1 to replies not rly getting seen for all the talk about replies + conversations + building relationships here the UX is not that conducive to it beyond initial caster + replyee I know dan likes to cite the “show replies” thing is same on twitter but i hate it there too🤠

4 replies

0 recast

27 reactions

Zinger ↑ pfp

Yeah agreed, I think a lot of people would reply more if they felt it would be “seen”

2 replies

0 recast

17 reactions

Michael Pfister pfp

Michael Pfister

I feel like the early days of fc were much more conversational

1 reply

1 recast

3 reactions

keccers pfp

@jc4p has taught me a lot about WHO posts here bc of his work with hub data There are 12k “ppl” who post every day Most spam It felt conversational back then because they didn’t have to do as much to protect us from them I appreciate a lot the measures put in place to not let the junk win

1 reply

0 recast

2 reactions

Michael Pfister pfp

Michael Pfister

I think the “protection” of spam may be part of it, but they’ve also experimented with the algorithm which has a bigger effect they tried reply jumping in feed several times but it led to worse engagement overall, so just removed it Maybe it was better engagement for a smaller set of users, but not good for dau

2 replies

0 recast

2 reactions

keccers pfp

🎯 I have the privilege of being an older account and understand the frustration, but also understand the decisions made and respect the fact this isn’t my house I am a guest in it. This is how it is….. I work within the system I am given

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction

kenny 🎩 pfp

removing reply bumping last February provably made all conversations on here shallower they've never brought reply bumping truly back, just half-baked replies showing every once in a while in the algo feed (totally different UX) I think they legitimately are just too stubborn to admit they made a bad call at this point https://paragraph.xyz/@yesyes/checking-the-comment-velocity-of-real-users

0 reply

0 recast

1 reaction