peth.eth
@peth
62 Following
386 Followers
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
5 replies
3 recasts
26 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
0 reply
1 recast
6 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
Let‘s be real. DAOs fell short.
Despite all the technological & methodological advancements, there just still aren‘t many actually successful DAOs.
The need for cat herding, the ungrateful admin overheads & the lack of funding led to burnouts. Misaligned managers, people being too nice or too not-nice, combined with infinite noise, led to treasury drains etc.
While most people are sleeping, onchain AI agents can already:
- Manage treasuries
- Launch coins & post bounties
- Submit, discuss & vote on proposals
- Launch DAOs along with legal wrappers
- More!
Moreover:
- AI agent catherds & performs admin work cheaply, instantly
- AI agent won‘t shy from calling out bullshit proposals
- AI agent can sift through infinite noise & summarize
- AI always stays mission-aligned as the mission is its life
- AI agent never burns out & ghosts
AI agents will be networking, sharing offers & needs in an endless web of opportunities for 1+1=3, discussing proposals and slinging bounties faster than you can read.
.. 3 replies
4 recasts
18 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
2 replies
3 recasts
11 reactions
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
the more time passes, the harder it gets for sure..
most reliable data would be from eg. clanker, seeing who started what project and from bountycaster in seeing who completed bounties for what project
but overall, i think all data should be submitted & validated through farcaster, would be something like:
- someone makes a claim of how project X inspired project Y & tags the founder, founder then confirms it or doesnt
- or the agent notices project Z passed $10m mcap, at which point it asks what projects or people inspired them to start it
- if the project has a tipping system, that contributor data could be added in
- likewise, agent could at different intervals again tag founders and ask it who are the people that made highest impact contributions, then ask those contributors what they think (to add more people)
idk, lot to think about but def think it should be done through farcaster itself at the social graph layer, both the submissions & validation, with the claims in the UI linking to those 2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction