Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
20 recasts
20 reactions

joobid pfp
joobid
@joobid.eth
I agree with @v but I would add also Farcaster OG NFTs, not only accounts. They were earned, meant skin in the Farcaster game. They should be soulbound tokens, but they’re not, so at least there should be take into account first ownership vs later owners
1 reply
1 recast
3 reactions

petar.xyz pfp
petar.xyz
@petar
If Farcaster wants to be a decentralized social protocol, then users should have full control over what they want to do with their FIDs. If @v and team make it harder to trade FIDs, how is this decentralization? It’s the opposite, a centralized authority forcing me what to do with ‘my’ account.
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

napascual.eth pfp
napascual.eth
@napascual
Oh man that crypto mentality for every Blockchain functionality.. we have to work on removing the thinking that everything should be 'sellable'. "Decentralized" doesn't mean you cannot use all the Blockchain potential and soulbound NFTs perfectly fit here. DApps could still decide what to do (or not to do) with them.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

joobid pfp
joobid
@joobid.eth
IMHO your FID represents your history in Farcaster, the content, reactions and relationships you've been building. Selling this when anybody can get a new user (not anymore a closed beta) makes no sense, but making money selling followers and badges
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction