Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

Pedro Gomes pfp
Pedro Gomes
@pedrouid.eth
Honestly we should stop using terms like "transactions", "user operations" or "messages" when talking about Wallets Just call it "actions"... for every Wallet approval 😎
3 replies
5 recasts
18 reactions

Tudor 🟣🟑 pfp
Tudor 🟣🟑
@tudorizer
Would that not imply a complete change of the vocabulary? Stemming from "wallet", "transactions" seem to follow the same skeuomorphism. My theory is that this entire metaphor has run its course. Most wallets are now more akin to Robinhood than something friendly, familiar and subjective.
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

Sinaver pfp
Sinaver
@sinaver.eth
yah, operations are better, and that's what typically used in conventional financial consumer products
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

logonaut.eth 🎩 ツ ↑ πŸ– pfp
logonaut.eth 🎩 ツ ↑ πŸ–
@logonaut.eth
I agree with @tudorizer here. In addition to calling them actions, i’d go a step further and stop pushing β€œwallet” as a mental model altogether. People know what a browser is, and they are accustomed to approving/rejecting actions and granting/revoking permissions with one. Let’s call them browsers with built-in keychains β€” or something along those lines. Calling them wallets almost strikes me as expressive aphasia 🫠
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction