Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
frames v2 are great but as 99% of the time desktop user im really not incentivized to build any until I can use them myself. Yes I understand 85% of traffic on warpcast is mobile currently. No, I don't think having very different behaviours is the way to go. (its just really confusing imho) I'll wait for frames v2 to be supported by all platforms equally to code any frames for it. In my opinion this would be as easy as to make URL's support transitions and serve both framesv1 and framesv2 meta tags on their OG metadata, that way warpcast client can render a frame+mini-app url on desktop, and frames v2 on mobile. as it is frames v2 on desktop are just regular links, which makes it not a frame
6 replies
3 recasts
18 reactions

patxol 🔷 anser.social  pfp
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
Opportunity to build your own desktop client for Frames V2 😏
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions

agusti pfp
agusti
@bleu.eth
nah fam ill just wait it out 😂
0 reply
0 recast
2 reactions