Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
agusti
@bleu.eth
frames v2 are great but as 99% of the time desktop user im really not incentivized to build any until I can use them myself. Yes I understand 85% of traffic on warpcast is mobile currently. No, I don't think having very different behaviours is the way to go. (its just really confusing imho) I'll wait for frames v2 to be supported by all platforms equally to code any frames for it. In my opinion this would be as easy as to make URL's support transitions and serve both framesv1 and framesv2 meta tags on their OG metadata, that way warpcast client can render a frame+mini-app url on desktop, and frames v2 on mobile. as it is frames v2 on desktop are just regular links, which makes it not a frame
5 replies
3 recasts
18 reactions
$ comes, goes but vibe is ♾️
@proxystudio.eth
bruh just build the frame lol
1 reply
1 recast
8 reactions
Sangohan.base.eth 🟠
@sangohan
But if we implement a Farcaster login button (for context) and manage the display for desktop, could that help as a temporary solution while waiting for more features?
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
patxol 🔷 anser.social
@patxol.eth
Opportunity to build your own desktop client for Frames V2 😏
1 reply
0 recast
2 reactions
Jilt 🎩
@jilt
Thanks for letting me know, been in the flow for automated defi transactions and needed to catch up with frames v2, doesn't look like my cup of tea rn
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
carrrrrlos
@carrrrrlos.eth
I’m w/ you. work on dt, chill on phone. v2 feels like beta - but glad i’m here for it.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
