this OpEd reads as intellectually dishonest. 2 Qs:

1 why is it fine for women to be single-issue voters on abortion but not for others to be on crypto?

2 how is it fine to twist the pro-crypto stance from “supporting economic freedom” to “selfish financial interests”?

answer seems to be in the last paragraph

I read it twice. I see arguments on both sides of the conversation - and it's nearly impossible to sum it up in one paragraph...

But definitive statements catch the eye (it is, after all, MEDIA)

I think this paragraph is likely more telling than the first or last... politicians will tell you whatever you want to hear

/ted | exploring the onchain frontier | surfing @ venice, ca | eating @ gjusta / gjelina