Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
ted (not lasso)
@ted
ok maybe i'm dumb but isn't a $1 open edition kinda the same as paying 99 cents for a song on apple music circa 2009??? there are reasons we as listeners evolved past that model, incl better flexibility, variety, costs, and discovery — right? yes, crypto allows for artists to reward early fans BUT fred again and taylor swift and maggie rogers did this without crypto individual song mints could make sense for consumers who want exclusive content (ownership), supporting indie artists (patronage), permanent access, but those are the exception to the rule: the vast majority of consumers prefer the streaming model imo better model would be /hypersubs to access a curated library of $1 songs where artists get distribution through trusted musical curators instead of a centralized platform and some sort of revenue share if a listener really loves the song, they can decide to mint that individual song for $1 idk just spitballing
21 replies
5 recasts
75 reactions
nuconomy ⌐◨-◨
@nuconomy.eth
I was left thinking about this yesterday. Still feels like there needs to be some value add for minting a song when you can stream. A website fan area on with access to bonus content is scalable, you don't have to meet every fan. Otherwise only my favourite or new artists get minted as a gesture of support.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
OrnellaWeb3
@ornella
I think just supporting is totally fine, let's push sole appreciation for music. I think it can work best long-term rather than putting pressure on artists to do so many IRL things, that should be a bonus opt-in from the artist if they are social and extroverted people but not a given for the supporter.
0 reply
0 recast
1 reaction
