Farcaster

wrote up my thoughts on what $ANON means for project tokens, and why letting the community launch project tokens might be genius. read the full post:

wrote up my thoughts on what $ANON means for project tokens, and why letting the community launch project tokens might be genius. read the full post:

https://ntik.me/posts/community-launch

hacking anon.page prev 2x founder, improbable, github, amazon. ntik.me

Fun havoooooooor | Co-creator of the universe | FuckANiche.com | prev @forefront

they could, and would - but the vibe would probably be off compared to the authentic equivalent

Love the idea. Will read shortly but did you cover astroturfing? Like.. if this becomes the meta, couldn't a team launch the token via unconnected wallets to make it look like the community launched the token?

job: token analyst. Talk to me about football, sports, crypto, outdoors, growth, econ, investing, chess

$BLEU

this matches my experience building out /bleu alongside the community and because they pulled me to it, i never planned any of it and that made it the fairest of launches imho.

6m building our dear community and meeting wonderful people who like the elephant.

agree to some extend. but token launches have also been an effective method to bootstrap liquidity, esp for small teams. 

in a many-tokens-one-wins world, plenty users will be left burnt on the ones that didn't win. creates more surface area for KOLs to have an edge in. so still seems very zero sum pvp to me.