Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction
nounspaceTom.eth
@nounspacetom
gm friends! Today I woke up to some false, negative (and imho, rude) comments from @frog and @jkm.eth on our candidate prop to double down on /nounspace. @krel signaled against too (sadly no feedback yet). I just responded and hope they'll reconsider (it doesn't seem like they actually read the prop yet, let alone tried the product). For those of you that have actually been following what the team and I have been working so hard on these past few months, would appreciate your support in refuting them. Would hate to see one of, if not the best opportunity available to /nouns (in my humble, biased opinion) abandoned due to a few false, negative takes. I'm gonna go ahead and post it here for anyone that's curious. Always happy to answer any questions, and would prefer open convos in public rather than jumping to literally the worst possible conclusions/accusations. Can also read it and their comments here: https://www.nouns.camp/candidates/double-down-on-nounspacewtf-06ae622bf2029db79bdebd38f723f1f33f95f6c5
6 replies
2 recasts
20 reactions
nounspaceTom.eth
@nounspacetom
gm @jkm.eth, @krel, and @frog. Surprised to hear all of this, but grateful to finally get some feedback/acknowledgement from you. I am disappointed to see so many negative and false assumptions though. I’m very interested in continuing development on nounspace and strongly believe it’s in the community’s best interest, so please allow me to address your points. Lmk if I missed any.
2 replies
1 recast
3 reactions
nounspaceTom.eth
@nounspacetom
1. This project came about because the community wanted a fun Farcaster client A. Correct, which we’ve delivered the v0 of. Now, we are proposing that the community continue funding development of it.
1 reply
0 recast
4 reactions
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
Feels like those three are just trolls.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
