Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Follow up: what would a token-gated experience solve for you on Farcaster *today*?
40 replies
3 recasts
41 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
monetization outside the walls of warpcast
2 replies
0 recast
13 reactions

Jonny Mack pfp
Jonny Mack
@nonlinear.eth
communities are defined by boundaries: who can enter and who can’t channels are currently like hashtags: anyone can enter. gating would make them more like real communities this would give hosts more autonomy, agency, and a feeling of true ownership every host a founder
4 replies
0 recast
17 reactions

ted (not lasso) pfp
ted (not lasso)
@ted
i agree the end state should be this, but the Q i ask myself is why is *now* the right time to launch that? imo, FC has provided value to many sides with its accessibility and its openness. it’s magical. what are the pros/cons of /nouns not being token-gated? if not many cons, is now the time to intro exclusivity?
2 replies
0 recast
0 reaction

Nounish Prof βŒβ—§-β—§πŸŽ© pfp
Nounish Prof βŒβ—§-β—§πŸŽ©
@nounishprof
Nouns is a HUGE ecosystem even though it only has a few hundred members of Nouns DAO proper. Limiting the channel would be detrimental to proliferation. That said β€” a second token gated one might be useful. There are token gated discord channels for prop discussions.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction