Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
1. Agree it’s hard for new users! But it’s always been hard for new users. We’re going to be adding “onboard directly to a channel” when joining Farcaster as the next big project for channels. 2. Channels as hashtags / topics did not work. We iterated for a year trying to make it work. 3. So we’re trying a new direction that is more like public group chats with a feed UX. 4. A reminder that casting in your home feed like Twitter is available to everyone.
10 replies
9 recasts
76 reactions

OTTI🎨🖌 pfp
OTTI🎨🖌
@zeuzc
I agree it has always been hard but not this hard…
1 reply
0 recast
5 reactions

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
It’s no harder than Twitter
3 replies
0 recast
4 reactions

OTTI🎨🖌 pfp
OTTI🎨🖌
@zeuzc
Indeed, but don’t you think about some form of exploitation? If the channels were even based on fan tokens it’s a better use case than hypersub because that way your “ownership” always stays in your own wallet.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Dan Romero pfp
Dan Romero
@dwr.eth
Not sure I understand
1 reply
0 recast
1 reaction

OTTI🎨🖌 pfp
OTTI🎨🖌
@zeuzc
In simple terms, I feel it would be better if the owner of a channel either approves membership manually or uses “fan tokens” because that way the user can always get their bucks back unlike hypersub. Might make new users feel safe
2 replies
0 recast
1 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Hypersub is more akin to patreon. For those who already had hypersubs this provides an additional benefit we can share. Fan tokens come with speculation—that’s not always a good thing for creators especially because holders can be quite demanding. Also leads to spam. Very different use cases and expectations. And some channels will use free options. Most of this relates to limiting spam. From the channel owner perspective, the spam has been unrelenting and adds a lot of wasted time. Hopefully this will help with that.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction