Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goldy ββ¨-β¨
@goldy
a new wave of defeatist signalling from some nouners coming out of the latest noundry proposals. annoying to see lame signals sent to artists, I hope artists don't get too discouraged from it. Does the noundry team have the capacity and ideas to remove the need for trait upgradable for 3rd party products?
5 replies
0 recast
4 reactions
Nounish Prof ββ§-β§π©
@nounishprof
It might be helpful to do this at a set time so that integrating the new traits could be better managed. I donβt mind voting on indivisible traits (that makes sense) but if itβs causing a problem every time there is a new one, maybe they could be done in a batch.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goldy ββ¨-β¨
@goldy
if people think this is a problem then work to solve it without slamming the breaks on the trait submission process, yet again, after it finally reached exactly where the DAO asked it to be 12 months ago. fwiw so far the only two devs who have spoken publically about this have said that it isn't really a big problem.
1 reply
0 recast
3 reactions
Nounish Prof ββ§-β§π©
@nounishprof
Ok well maybe Noundry can work on proposing a fix? @indexcard.eth can you shed light on the issue? I know you mentioned this the other day that with each trait it breaks something. And I think the same is happening with fomo/nomo correct @toadyhawk.eth?
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
Goldy ββ¨-β¨
@goldy
yes well Noundry team working on a solution is exactly what I suggested with the cast at the top π its clear it definitely breaks (the way most or all apps seem to be built), but the extent to which it is hard to fix is the question i am asking.
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction
