noundry

a new wave of defeatist signalling from some nouners coming out of the latest noundry proposals.

annoying to see lame signals sent to artists, I hope artists don't get too discouraged from it.

Does the noundry team have the capacity and ideas to remove the need for trait upgradable for 3rd party products?

curiosity maxi.

co-founder of @nounish and @nounsfest.  creator of gifs.

i would think the DAO would fund anything credible and reasonable around this

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/ 

if people think this is a problem then work to solve it without slamming the breaks on the trait submission process, yet again, after it finally reached exactly where the DAO asked it to be 12 months ago.

fwiw so far the only two devs who have spoken publically about this have said that it isn't really a big problem.

It might be helpful to do this at a set time so that integrating the new traits could be better managed. I don’t mind voting on indivisible traits (that makes sense) but if it’s causing a problem every time there is a new one, maybe they could be done in a batch.

"nouns find a way"

working on trying to find a sustainable solutions for this.

What’s the lesson you think proposers are able to learn in this context?

Nouns Governance. It ain’t easy but it’s rewarding if you pass. And also a great learning if you get defeated.