I’m assuming the reply with 5 bullet points of what you got done this week is going to be evaluated by an LLM that’s prompted with something like “compared to job description, tenure and salary was this an expected level of output”

Of course will be a massive controversy. 

First at-scale use of AI for “performance improvement”.

Imagine you’re an air traffic controller coming off a bajillion hour work week to this email, knowing your livelihood depends on how your reply to said email is judged by some code written by a child cybercriminal named Big Balls. I mean honestly. They should all quit. It’s what anyone with dignity would do.

The Farcaster formerly known as Kchamp. Books, beats, bodybuilding, bright ideas and beautiful things.

katherinechampagne.com

Nope — don’t quit. Make them fire you.

building /gmfarcaster network |
blockchain ENT prof |  ⌐◧-◧ Nouncillor, Nouner, BuilderDAO community resident /builder |

https://www.gmfarcaster.com/

Normally I would agree with Nounish but in this case I feel like the only power to be had is in something akin to a general strike. 100% of these people should leave.

yes, if you can get a mass walkout/strike that would be great -- but highly unlikely -- so if faced with a choice to take a package and resign, don't. There's be no funds put aside for this so no guarantee you'll be paid a severance so it's pretty risky. But if you're fired, and it violates your CBA/contract or civil service laws, you have recourse. If you quit, you don't. 

But the urge to resign is going to be hard to battle.