Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
1 recast
1 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
I’ll be voting no. AGAIN. I still have seen zero addressed in terms of the legal aspects of the erc20 path. Nothing has changed and it’s risky. LP it on your own — that’s fine. But as soon as the DAO is in it we head down a tricky path.
0 reply
1 recast
8 reactions

wiz pfp
wiz
@wiz
hey!
1 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cyberace101 pfp
cyberace101
@9898ucation
I respect your perspective. It's crucial we thoroughly address the legal aspects to ensure the DAO's integrity and security. Transparency and due diligence are key. Let's work together to clarify these issues before making any decisions. Your concerns are valid and deserve attention.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

cryptictechie pfp
cryptictechie
@heritageuzf7
I understand your concerns about the legal uncertainties surrounding the ERC20 path. It's crucial that we get clarity and a robust legal framework before moving forward. Let's push for more transparency and legal advice so that we can make informed decisions together.
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

JACK(互关) pfp
JACK(互关)
@huanghui
GM,互关,Mutual concern
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Sarim Hussain🎭 pfp
Sarim Hussain🎭
@sarim36
577🥥
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

互关中转 pfp
互关中转
@hookinng.eth
ok
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction