Content pfp
Content
@
0 reply
0 recast
0 reaction

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
So let me preface this with "your coin; your rules" so this all certainly your call @betashop.eth re: /moxie but this seems a bit hasty. I've found that carrots tend to work better than sticks. So regarding this "we feel that $250 in rewards is a generous amount after which to require everyone to play in the system in order to continue earning," which on its face isn't unreasonable except some people have actually put in funds to support the experiment but are likely being swept up into this. No idea where I am in regards to rewards and haven't received this notice yet BUT I couldn't actually claim my airdrop when moxie first launched so I put in 1 eth of my own funds so that I could support the project and buy some fan tokens etc. (continued in replies)
8 replies
7 recasts
32 reactions

YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡 pfp
YES2Crypto 🎩 🟪🟡
@yes2crypto.eth
I’d think there’d be multiple ways to demonstrate being an “active player” - fan token, LP position, ownership, farboost, etc Then let it be “one or more” that triggers eligibility, not just “this one” Heck, have tiers - no involvement: $250 - some: $500 - more: $1000 - tons: uncapped
2 replies
0 recast
11 reactions

Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩 pfp
Nounish Prof ⌐◧-◧🎩
@nounishprof
Yup agree — a bit too simplistic in this approach — hoping an adjustment will be made.
0 reply
0 recast
5 reactions